Archive for June, 2008

Can ideas make you money? Why not?

Wednesday, June 25th, 2008

I once remember reading something along the line that ideas are free, or at most a dime for a dozen. However, right now, it comes to my notice that, sometimes, ideas can be worth much more than a dime. :P

We usually, tend to be more pragmatic, and say that action is what that counts. That means, action instead of ideas is what that will bring us the money. Hmm. But, guess what? If you have good ideas, and by typing your new ideas in less than 100 words, you stand to win $1000 hard cash.

Currently, Action community for entrepreneurship (ACE) is running a contest – “Why Not?”, in which by writing your ideas in one of the area for
(a) increasing Singapore’s attractiveness as a place for business,
(b) nurturing entrepreneurs of tomorrow, and
(c) encourage more innovative and competitive business, you stand to win $1000 cash.

If you think even further, everything around us actually started with an idea. We have the Heinz tomato started off with selling tomato soup. They made it big by serving more and more people. The Wright brothers believed in their idea of making a flying machine, made many tries, and successfully became the first to invent airplane. So, ideas is always the first step.

Now, in our current world, ideas by themselves can also be use to make money. How? That is where patent law comes in. A good novel idea, and with proper understanding/knowledge of how to make a product or a procedure, will allow one to file a patent, and upon successfully granted the patent, the patent holder can make money through licensing royalty.

So, “why not?” be an entrepreneur? Click here to enter for the contest. :) Remember the deadline is 17 July 2008, “why not?” submit your ideas now? :P

This post is an advertorial from BLOG2u

“Buy” teenage bride for S$38,000 dowry

Sunday, June 15th, 2008

According to ST, an unidentified 92-year-old Saudi man proposed marriage to a poor 17-year-old Egyption village girl, offering a dowry of around S$38,000 as well as gold jewellery. The girl’s very poor parents, accepted the proposed marriage.

Hmm. Reading it, it reminds me of a cross between Madonna’s adoption of a Malawian boy, and the olden days arranged marriage. Money does make the world go round in a certain sense. And after all, which parents do not want their child to have a better life, be it being adopted or married to a rich partner. However, for the case of marriage, it is related to the right to choose your own partner.

I guess it is too late at 2am. I am unable to write a proper discussion.

AVA to importers: stop importing and initiate recall on tomatos

Friday, June 13th, 2008

In view of the FDA alert in USA on the outbreak of Salmonella Saintpaul, that was associated to the consumption of three varieties of tomatoes – the raw red plum tomatoes, the red Roma tomatoes and round red tomatoes, our Singapore AVA has reacted and issued instructions to importers, to stop importing and recall these affected varieties of tomatoes.

So, what is the best thing to do? Don’t take such US tomatoes that are lying in your home. Get rid of them to prevent any of your family member from eating them accidentally. Don’t purchase any of these three varieties of US tomatoes, that might be available, as the news might not have reached some shops owner.

Recall of three varieties of tomatoes from USA

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has issued an alert to inform consumers in the USA that an outbreak of Salmonella Saintpaul, has been linked to the consumption of raw red plum tomatoes, red Roma tomatoes and round red tomatoes.

As a precautionary measure, AVA has instructed importers to stop importing these three varieties of tomatoes from USA and initiated a recall of the tomatoes from the retailers with immediate effect.

AVA advises consumers who have purchased such US tomatoes not to consume them and to discard them.

Click here for more information.

Article obtained from AVA website on 13 Jun 2008

Justice for a victim, but many molesters go scot-free

Thursday, June 12th, 2008

In Apr 2008, there was an article on TNP. “SHE woke up with a start after sensing that someone was touching her private parts.” In this case, the molester was convicted of the crime.

However, let’s analyst how many think of molest. We got comment like the following.

“I wonder why the lady slept without locking her door at night? She was renting a room, so she should have been wise to lock the door.

Just curious about such a suspicious circumstance. She was like inviting trouble. No doubt the landlord should not have opened her door, but why she took such a risk to ruin a man and his family?”

As illustrated above, in the mind of a number, their view is that that it is the lady’s fault. They will claim that that it is just natural that a guy will want to satisfy his needs and that it is just a touch anyway. It is the lady’s fault for not locking the door, not veil-up like a mummy, and for not stopping the guy.

However, this exactly shows how the moral of the society has deteriorated.

  1. (It is only natural.) I naturally want a car. Does it means that it is natural that I steal and it is the fault of the car owner for leaving the car in the car-park. So, I should not be convicted of stealing.
  2. (It is just a touch only.) What about saying, I just borrowed the car for a few years only. I didn’t harm the owner in any way, so, I should not be convicted too.
  3. (I was tempted.) It is the car owner who tempted me with such a nice car, which I have always eyed. Therefore, it is the car owner’s fault for tempting me. It is not my fault. I should not be convicted too.
  4. (I was not stopped.) The car owner did not stop me from stealing the car. So, the car owner allowed me to steal the car. It is again not my fault. So, I should not be convicted too.

As such, laws are being written to make it an offence to molest (or for the illustration used, stealing is an offence.) It is never right to molest. Those who say that it is right, means that their moral has gone to dogs.

It is a sad thing, that according to AWARE (Association of Women for Action & Research), at least 3 cases of outrage of modesty is reported everyday in Singapore, and a silent majority does not report it.

And in addition, even though the law in Singapore does make outrage of modesty an offence in Singapore, it is not an offence under Singapore law, if molest occurred outside Singapore. The saddest thing is that there is local who [molested?] another local when they are oversea, and does get scot-free using this legal loop-hole.

Budget ticket no more? See the [bias?] reporting

Tuesday, June 10th, 2008

According to the Straits Times report, “Budget no more“, there is an attached pdf that does the comparison.

I extracted just the comparison on Perth. Is anything missing?

Looking at the comparison performed by ST, it seems that Tiger Airways is giving a bad deal. No promotion price is mentioned. So, I did a search on Tiger Airways website. The cheapest return fair that I found is $440.98 (Airfare: $89.98 Tax: $351). Even when we add the luggage charges of $40 for 30kg check-in and S$4 per passenger per sector for Convenience Fee, it adds up to $488.98 / person. Now, perhaps, I know the reason behind the ranking of Straits Times. :)

(Update: The price given by ST in the above image is for two to go, and is the total price for two. The Tiger Airways normal price is based on $159.99 per sector per person. It is not the cheapest fare available from Tiger Airways.)

Update: And Tiger Airways is running this promotion to Darwin, $169 one way, inclusive of tax. That means, $386 total ($169 * 2 return fare inclusive of tax + $40 30kg check-in luggage + $8 convenience fee). So, it really depends on (1) when one is traveling, (2) where one is traveling and (3) whether traveling alone or in 2.

The reason behind having Patent holder who is not part of Patent marketing company

Sunday, June 8th, 2008

Quoting About.com on Acquiring and Defending Patents: Part2 – Fighting Patent Infringement,

I believe it is best to hold patents in your own name rather then assigning them to your company. You should form a corporation whose purpose is to market the inventions. Have a contract that licenses the right to market the patents and any products created on a non-exclusive basis to your marketing corporation. This contract needs to specifically state that it is not transferable to new ownership of the corporation and that it is renewable at six month or one year intervals at the licenser’s sole discretion. The purpose of the contract is to create a situation where a judgment against your marketing corporation is worthless because the right to market the invention is not transferable. This approach reserves the right for you to license the patent to others if your first corporation comes under attack by an infringer or for any other situation such as product liability.

Update: Reading the above, I guess everyone can guess why there is a difference for the current patent matter that is blowing all over Singapore Internet. In addition, I think it will bring some clarification that since the IPOS mentioned that they are different, it just point to something else, rather than being S**M which everyone is thinking.

More people forced to search for free meals is not unique to Singapore

Sunday, June 8th, 2008

The recent raising food price have pushed more people in Singapore to search for free meals.

More people join the queue for free meals
April 13, 2008
By Jamie Ee Wen Wei & Aw Cheng Wei

Rising food prices have prompted more people to turn up at places serving free meals.

The organisers – religious and welfare groups – say they can cope with the demand for now, though some have noted a worrying drop in donations from sponsors.

A Sunday Times check with about 20 welfare and religious groups reveals that almost half have the same story to tell.

At the Singapore Buddhist Lodge in River Valley, about 1,800 people turn up daily for vegetarian breakfast, lunch and dinner…

Article extracted from Strait Times

Now, take a look at our rich USA. The richest nation on earth, is also facing the same problem. More people are lining up for free food too. They are also struggling to make ends meet. Looks like the world is heading towards big trouble.

Downturn forces more in US to rely on free food
June 6, 2008

MONROE (Georgia)/DOUGLAS (Arizona) – IN the richest nation on earth, a rising number of people line up for free food because they are struggling to put meals on the table at home.

Demand at food banks in the United States is up 15 per cent to 20 per cent over last year and many food banks are having difficulty coping, according to America’s Second Harvest, the largest United States food bank provider with 200 in its network.

Food bank networks procure nonperishable and fresh produce from suppliers, then stock it in warehouses before distributing it via a chain of community food banks across the country.

The total number of people who use them is not known but the upward trend is one sign of a US economic downturn in which soaring fuel costs and the rising price of other basic goods have pushed many people on low incomes or without jobs into hardship…

Article extracted from Straits Times

Tiger Airways. Fragile check-in broken, along with my trust.

Saturday, June 7th, 2008

Today, I learnt something new about Tiger Airways. Perhaps it is not new to everyone. So, what is it? What happened? Two of my family members had just returned this morning by Tiger Airways. They checked-in six 60×80cm framed paintings that are nicely wrapped by a few layers of bubbled plastic and are labelled with “FRAGILE! PLS HANDLE WITH CARE”. A sample of the bubbled plastic that was taken off from a framed painting can be seen here.

They specially informed the check-in counter personnel that the six items are fragile, and requested for the items to be handled with care. The only answer they got was, “check-in at you own risk”.

So, what does that means? Does it means that there is no fragile luggage check-in service? Or does it means that check-in will go missing? Or… Is it just the standard terms and condition to ensure that they are not liable for any transportation issues?

The answer was very clear when the check-in framed paintings were retrieved. Three of the six frames were broken during transport. You can see one of the broken frame here. It must have been violently thrown, that despite the wooden frames being layered wrapping with bubbled plastic, the frame broke off and wooden splinters were visible.

With such an experience, I can only conclude that, if there is fragile items, get a ticket from the full-service airline. I will never trust a budget airline to deliver fragile goods safely. They need to cut corners cost to be budget.

Update: Quoting Tiger Airway’s Conditions of Carriage

9.2 Valuable And Fragile Goods:
Passengers should not check in such items as baggage. If they are checked in as baggage, passengers agree they send for carriage such items at their own risk. Such items include money, jewellery, precious metals, silverware, electronic devices, computers, cameras, video equipment, mobile phones, negotiable papers, securities or other valuables, passports and other identification documents, title deeds, artefacts, manuscripts and the like.

This website will be under maintenance from 11am-2pm on 7th Jun 2008

Saturday, June 7th, 2008

I have just received notification from my host that the server which this site is on will be under maintenance from 11am-2pm (or even longer) on 7th Jun 2008. The site will be down. Sorry for the short notice.

Bad news for budget travellers

Saturday, June 7th, 2008

Sigh. Yes, I am sighing. With all the things getting on around me, I tend to sigh a lot more these days. Anyway, back to the topic. According to ST, Tiger Airways, yes, the one that flies out of Singapore budget terminal. Tiger has decided to implement a new baggage ruling since 29th May 2008. The default baggage allowance now stands at just 7kg hand luggage, with no check-in luggage allowance. Those who wants check-in luggage allowances will have to pay between $5 – $40 for (15 – 30kg allowance) if it is 72 hours before take-off, or $20 – $200 for (15 – 30kg allowance) if it is anytime within 72 hours to take-off. Did your eyes just popped out? Yes, it is $200 for 30kg luggage allowance.

Click here for Tiger’s website on excess luggage.